Jen odbocimpac nekde to napsat musim. Porad nekdo pise ze neco je politicky reseni. A co je apoliticky reseni? Kde jsou penize budou zajmy.

Muj tip je, ze cinsky mineri, co skryte kooperuji(navenek muzou jit i proti sobe), maji >51% davno. Neni to problem,mohou to zneuzivat jen omezene.

Problem pro ne neni Segwit, ale Segwit v SF. Segwit HF jim nevadi. Duvodem jsou minimalne z velky casti jejich zisky. At uz asicboost nebo neco jineho.

Pokud dojde k dohode musi to byt win-win-win, jinak by dohoda nebyla. Je fajn ten UASF navrh, kdyz nic jineho, je to oslabeni pozic mineru. Kompromis segwit+2MB muze byt technicky picovina, ale smysl imo ma, aspon se neco pohne a segwit je dulezitej z jinych duvodu nez scaling. Rikam to z pozice ze nerozumim kodum, ale verim lidem, co jim rozumi.

Na druhou stranu verim ze bitcoin prezije i bez SW.<div style="font-size: xx-small;color: #0000ff;display: inline-block;text-align: center;width: 100%;">
<a href="https://popacular.com" rel="noreferrer">slot deposit pulsa</a>, <a href="https://nonton555.com/" rel="noreferrer">layarkaca21</a>, <a href="http://slot-gacor.nysenate.gov" rel="noreferrer">situs slot online</a>, <a href="http://slot-deposit-pulsa.learning.moleskine.com/" rel="noreferrer">deposit pulsa tanpa potongan</a>, <a href="https://occmakeup.com/" rel="noreferrer">slot gacor</a>, <a href="http://canvas.iw.edu/" rel="noreferrer">slot gacor hari ini</a>
</div>